CORRECTING THE NORTHERN LIGHT
The March 26, 2026 article in The Northern Light identifies me as a member of Save Blaine, which I have never been. I was a member of Blaine Water Coalition speakers bureau, as noted on my June 25, 2025 Blaine City Council application. I explained all this in January to the new publisher, Kari Mar.
In 2023, prior to my involvement, Save Blaine called out Blaine Mayor Mary Lou Steward for allowing self-dealing by Councilman Mike Hill, in violation of the Blaine City Council Rules of Procedure:
Rule 22
On June 14, 2025, Blaine Water Coalition exposed Blaine Planning Commissioner Sam Randhawa for self-dealing. On March 23, 2026, I exposed Councilwoman Sarbjit Bains for self-dealing in my COMPLAINT TO CITY CLERK CRAWFORD. The Northern Light covered up all three crimes by Blaine officials. Both Hill and Randhawa subsequently resigned from office without a peep from TNL.Each member present shall vote on all questions put to the City Council except on matters in which he or she has been disqualified for a conflict of interest or under the appearance of fairness doctrine. Such member shall disqualify himself or herself prior to any discussion of the matter and shall leave the City Council Chambers.
Rule 29
Councilmembers should recognize that the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine does not require that a conflict of interest be established, but whether there is an appearance of conflict of interest to the average person. This may involve the councilmember or a councilmember’s business associate or a member of the councilmember’s immediate family. It could involve ex parte communications, ownership of property in the vicinity, business dealings with the proponents or opponents before or after the hearing, business dealings of the councilmember’s employer with the proponents or opponents, announced redisposition, and the like.
Prior to any quasi-judicial hearing, each City Councilmember should give consideration to whether a potential violation of the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine exists. If the answer is in the affirmative, no matter how remote, the City Councilmember should disclose such facts to the City Manager, who will seek the opinion of the City Attorney as to whether a potential violation of the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine exists. The City Manager shall communicate such opinion to the City Councilmember and to the Mayor. The City Councilmember shall also disclose such potential violation of the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine on the record prior to the start of the public hearing.
In September 2025, Blaine Water Coalition became Water Planning Matters in recognition of the collaboration with Birch Bay civic leaders, as we successfully opposed annexation of Birch Point by the City of Blaine. In February 2026, Water Planning Matters examined the judicial bias of Blaine Hearing Examiner Phil Olbrechts, who unlawfully removed evidence from the record proving fraud by Blaine officials using fake wetland and aquifer maps to accommodate developers. In March 2026, I opposed DOWNTOWN LOOTING by the city council.
None of this was ever mentioned in The Northern Light.
Comments
Post a Comment