ENDING THE PAYMASTER RELATIONSHIP
In Part 2 of Vanishing Science, Vanishing Fairness at Whatcom Watch , author Geoffrey Baker illustrates how hearing examiner bias favoring developers and the municipalities in bed with developers is systematically corrupt in Washington state . How can hearing examiners be unbiased when they are being paid by the very municipalities they are supposed to supervise? Techniques used by hearing examiners to deliver favorable rulings for developers: 1) Procedural Manipulation --aka trickery and deception 2) Scope Narrowing --aka wearing blinders to evidence 3) Standard Inflation --deferential treatment of developers 4) Burden Shifting --lying about appellants submissions 5) Credibility Suppression --demeaning citizens who aren't engineers paid to say what developers want 6) Evidence Minimization --discrediting state and federal environmental concerns 7) Asymmetrical Scrutiny --appellants experts dismissed What is especially interesting about this article are the sources used. In...