BLAINE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMENTS

February 10 letter to City of Blaine:

To comply with state law, Blaine must repeal the Urban Mixed Use rezone Ordinance No. 25-3028, which unlawfully reduced creek setbacks and other protections in violation of the Blaine Critical Areas Ordinance, as well as financially benefitted then planning commissioner Sam Randhawa and his employer, Freeman Real Estate (see attached complaint to U.S. Department of Justice). Randhawa and Freeman should not profit from crime, and the comprehensive plan is invalid until this ordinance is repealed.


Blaine must also repeal the June 10, 2024 reduction of parking requirements in the Central Business District Ordinance No. 24-3014, and the November 25, 2024 increase in building heights in the Central Business District text amendment, which were both voted on by then Councilman Mike Hill, who owns numerous commercial properties in the Central Business District, and did not recuse himself as state law requires.

All these rezones were done without public participation, as noted in the Pentland report on the Downtown Advisory Committee, which included Councilwoman Bains husband Gurdeep, who voted to increase building heights and reduce parking requirements for his three commercial properties, despite his financial conflict of interest.

Additionally, the lack of enforcement of the Blaine Municipal Code by City of Blaine Code Enforcement, as evidenced by the attached Water Planning Matters report on Shoreline Management Plan Compliance Failure, invalidates the comprehensive plan. 

The de-annexation of part of East Blaine was unlawful due to the fraudulent ballot measure Prop 7, and must be repealed as well. Learn more at URGENT ELECTION FRAUD WHATCOM COUNTY.

The City of Blaine 2025 Comprehensive Plan should be invalidated by Whatcom County for violating the letter and spirit of the Growth Management Act by 1) eliminating public participation, 2) concealing planning documents, and 3) retaliating against citizens who raise ethical questions about Blaine officials exposed self-dealing in recent rezone votes that removed critical area protection and reduced shoreline setbacks by half the county standard, all while lining their own pockets, which is a crime in Washington State.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BLAINE TOXIC COVERUP

2/25/25 letter to City of Blaine : BLAINE TOXIC COVERUP A Town that Never Learns By  Jay Taber Blaine Water Coalition Blaine City Council member  Mike Hill --recently under investigation by the Whatcom County Sheriff's Department for accosting Blaine Water Coalition activist Otto Pointer at the November 12, 2024, city council meeting (Case #24A39027)--has a problem with his plan to develop condos across Peace Portal Drive from his  Chevron  station downtown. In a November 28, 2023,  Hazardous Materials Analysis Report  presented by GeoEngineers to the City of Blaine, Hill's Chevron is listed as a 'high-risk' Department of Ecology site (Cleanup Site ID # 9280) due to confirmed releases of petroleum products--including  Benzene --on and off the property,  contaminating the groundwater  that migrates from the Chevron station under Starbuck's toward  Cain Creek  and  Drayton Harbor . The  Drayton Harbor estuary  is home t...
Read more

GUEST COMMENTARY REJECTED BY CASCADIA DAILY NEWS

The CDN article about the  East Blaine de-annexation  and UGA Swap excludes any mention of the extensively documented Blaine Water Coalition objections we sent to CDN well in advance. I feel this is not fair and balanced coverage. CDN reporter Julia Tellman attended the July 14, 2025 Blaine City Council meeting where as a city council vacancy applicant I introduced myself as a member of the Blaine Water Coalition (BWC) speakers bureau, and provided both an oral and written presentation with alleged legal violations by the city related to the proposed UGA Swap, as well as BWC's legal objections to previous well-documented evidence of City misconduct. Tellman mentioned none of this, nor the fact that I alone was hastily appointed at the meeting to write the voters pamphlet statement against the city-sponsored initiative, despite four additional qualified  ‘Con’  applicants  (important n ote: the City received only one ‘Pro’ Applicant) . . This city attem...
Read more

CARA PROTECTION DISTRICT PROPOSAL

November 24 letter to Whatcom County Council : Protect ing  Blaine and Birch Bay Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas (CARAs) Whatcom County oversees many special purpose districts with taxing authority to meet public needs. A  CARA Protection District  for Blaine and Birch Bay that can purchase the east Blaine and Birch Point CARA properties under county jurisdiction in order to protect our joint public water supply system, reduce flooding, and control urban pollution fits that purpose well.  Combined with improved stormwater management in the Drayton Harbor and Birch Bay watersheds, putting these aquifers in public hands would allow for public health, educational and recreational opportunities within an area beset by luxury, gated, planned unit developments. They could become forested 'greenway parks' as a n oasis from the surrounding chaos. Recommendation Whatcom  County Council   adopt  a  moratorium on  new  development applications...
Read more