REVISING BLAINE UGA POINTLESS

October 12 letter to City of Blaine:

In light of the October 3, 2025, letter from Whatcom County to the City of Blaine stating that the entire Birch Point area Blaine wants to annex for a luxury residential Urban Growth Area (UGA) is a Critical Aquifer Recharge Area that cannot be developed under the Growth Management Act (GMA), it is pointless for Blaine City Council to adopt Resolution 1984-25, a revised annexation plan for Birch Point. 

Since the only purpose of the City of Blaine 'Reduction of City Limits' Proposition 2025-07 is to convince Whatcom County to allow Blaine to expand its city limits by annexing Birch Point for luxury housing, and the county has rejected that, the resolution placing this on the ballot should be repealed. De-annexing the East Blaine UGA makes no sense. It should be redesignated a Protected Conservation Area, and kept in the city so we can protect our drinking water.

Likewise, the ordinances that unlawfully conferred financial benefits on Blaine officials Mike Hill and Gurdeep Bains (Central Business District building heights/parking), and Sam Randhawa (reduced setbacks and stormwater management on Cain Creek, Dakota Creek, and Drayton Harbor)--that are all part of the Blaine UGA element of the Blaine Comprehensive Plan--must be repealed in order for the City of Blaine to come into compliance with GMA.

 
Jay Taber, Blaine Water Coalition

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BLAINE TOXIC COVERUP

2/25/25 letter to City of Blaine : BLAINE TOXIC COVERUP A Town that Never Learns By  Jay Taber Blaine Water Coalition Blaine City Council member  Mike Hill --recently under investigation by the Whatcom County Sheriff's Department for accosting Blaine Water Coalition activist Otto Pointer at the November 12, 2024, city council meeting (Case #24A39027)--has a problem with his plan to develop condos across Peace Portal Drive from his  Chevron  station downtown. In a November 28, 2023,  Hazardous Materials Analysis Report  presented by GeoEngineers to the City of Blaine, Hill's Chevron is listed as a 'high-risk' Department of Ecology site (Cleanup Site ID # 9280) due to confirmed releases of petroleum products--including  Benzene --on and off the property,  contaminating the groundwater  that migrates from the Chevron station under Starbuck's toward  Cain Creek  and  Drayton Harbor . The  Drayton Harbor estuary  is home t...
Read more

Letter to County Prosecutor

To Mr. Eric J. Richey, Whatcom Prosecuting Attorney, 311 Grand, Ste. 201, Bellingham WA 98225 I write to you as Whatcom County Prosecuting Attorney in hope you will protect the rights of the people of Blaine from a city government that--due to embedded corruption--is unable to effectively govern and is putting our health and prosperity at risk by their unlawful acts. Your reply requested.  I am told you have the authority to empanel a grand jury to investigate official misconduct and encourage you to do so. I copy my most recent letter to the City of Blaine below. This is the tip of the iceberg, and we have abundant evidence of widespread intentional wrongdoing.   To Blaine City Council, Planning Commission, and Community Development Services As you proceed with the downtown rezone/development regulation items of parking and building heights this month, I remind you that this process was corrupted at the outset when on 3/24/2023 Blaine City Council ordered the Blaine City...
Read more

GUEST COMMENTARY REJECTED BY CASCADIA DAILY NEWS

The CDN article about the  East Blaine de-annexation  and UGA Swap excludes any mention of the extensively documented Blaine Water Coalition objections we sent to CDN well in advance. I feel this is not fair and balanced coverage. CDN reporter Julia Tellman attended the July 14, 2025 Blaine City Council meeting where as a city council vacancy applicant I introduced myself as a member of the Blaine Water Coalition (BWC) speakers bureau, and provided both an oral and written presentation with alleged legal violations by the city related to the proposed UGA Swap, as well as BWC's legal objections to previous well-documented evidence of City misconduct. Tellman mentioned none of this, nor the fact that I alone was hastily appointed at the meeting to write the voters pamphlet statement against the city-sponsored initiative, despite four additional qualified  ‘Con’  applicants  (important n ote: the City received only one ‘Pro’ Applicant) . . This city attem...
Read more